Lightweight Modular Causeway System (LMCS) for floating bridges

About a decade ago, the U.S. Army was disappointed that its existing causeway systems (floating bridges) did not meet its requirements for rapid deployment. The bridges were too heavy, required deep-draft vessels with high-load capacity cranes to transport and unload them, and took too long to deploy.

Rising to the challenge, engineers at the U.S. Army Engineer Research & Development Center (ERDC), developed the Lightweight Modular Causeway System (LMCS) to upgrade and replace existing systems, using design elements from both conventional floating causeways and modern tactical bridges. Key features of the LMCS are:

  • New double compressive joints, based on high-durometer urethane elastomers, that provide dependable repetitive compliance with minimal fatigue
  • Durable joint material (similar to material used to buffer building motions during earthquakes) that helps support large weight requirements
  • Compatibility with existing military container and cargo handling equipment, with a weight of only 600 pounds per linear foot.

The unique design allows military personnel to deploy the LMCS without a shore-based staging facility. This makes the LMCS adaptable and flexible for applications in challenging physical settings, such as post-disaster areas following earthquakes or severe storms, where ports have been damaged or destroyed.

Three Key Elements

The LMCS consists of the superstructure, flotation elements (large inflatable tubes), and compliant two-way compressive connections. Engineers designed a compliant system to better distribute loadings to the floatation elements, thereby reducing the internal bending stresses within the superstructure.

Compliance of the structural system allows greater deflection under the load, consequently resulting in greater buoyancy forces directly under the vehicles traversing the causeway.The compliance also allows for greater survivability of the causeway system when in the presence of large waves.

Each 40-foot section is composed of four modules and weighs approximately 6,500 pounds. Seven personnel can deploy 120 feet of the system in approximately three hours. Each module is 10 feet long by 20 feet wide and is supported by two 5-foot-diameter pneumatic floats. The internal pressure in the pneumatic tubes can be adjusted for easier penetration onto shallow, sandy beaches to conform to the bottom slope. The causeway is strong enough to support in excess of 70 tons (Military Load Class 70, main battle tank traffic).

It was designed to fit an Army Logistics Support Vessel (LSV), which can be used as the demonstration platform and for transporting and emplacing the LMCS. This system allows the LMCS to emerge from the LSV fully assembled, with floatation elements inflated. It incorporated material handling aspects, mechanical assembly of modules, and inflation of floatation in a semi-automated system that minimized manpower requirements and the time necessary to emplace and recover the LMCS.

Supporting Rescue Missions

Originally conceived as a vessel-to-shore bridging solution for a particular class of military watercraft, the LMCS has since been demonstrated to have viable wet-gap crossing capability for both military and emergency relief operations. It is also being considered as a possible solution for mud flat crossings and has been suggested for potential use as a temporary work platform in both swampy environments and open water.

The Engineer Research & Development Center expects the LMCS to be especially valuable for humanitarian assistance and disaster-relief operations in areas damaged by severe weather events. It can also provide expedient egress routes for evacuations and rapid interim replacements for bridges damaged by storms or terrorist actions (no similar capability currently exists to meet these needs).

A next generation of LMCS is currently being developed. The goal of this next generation of LMCS is to make the system more universal in its application potential. It will incorporate the compliance into the structural elements of the modules through selection of material properties and section properties, to meet strength and stiffness requirements.

About The Author

1 Comment

Comments are closed.